Films/DVD Asylum

RE: Spoiler alert

140.98.210.243

Revolver66

In Reply to: RE: Spoiler alert posted by Analog Scott on June 27, 2011 at 15:49:21

That's what I thought - the brother was 19 if I remember correctly. However, the Chastain and Pitt characters don't exhibit discernible aging (perhaps a comment on childhood memories),so it was confusing as to when they got the bad news of their son, as a child, as a man?

I'm with you - gonna let this one soak for a few days then give it another go.

Follow Ups:

RE: Spoiler alert - Analog Scott 18:04:39 06/28/11 (0)
As a makeup artist who knows the parties involved I would say it was a more practical problem. It bothered me as well.

I have to say now that I have seen it a second time it was actual far more linear than I remembered it being on the first viewing. I think I liked it even better the second time. There are many quick allusions and foreshadowings that play much better on a second viewing.

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable