Films/DVD Asylum

Posted by RedGrant (A) on August 22, 2011 at 17:28:49

In Reply to: RE: Malick is "after" what Kubrick portrayed far better in 2001. I actually posted by tinear on August 22, 2011 at 08:54:15

...what Kubrick did. '2001' did involve time sequence, but limted to one character and more 'linear' chronological form.


'Tree of Life' time sequence involved time sequence with multiple characters and in 'non-linear' chronological form.


It's not meant to be 'analyzed', it was meant to be 'felt'.


Btw. I remember what a pretentious bore I thought '2001' was when I first
saw it. I was 25 and expecting a 'Star Wars'!


Only when I saw it on big scree and when I was 42, then I got it.