|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.249.98.28
In Reply to: RE: True Detective, series 2 posted by free.ranger on July 03, 2015 at 18:22:37
One always wonders if something of value was overlooked, so I gave this episode a shot. I can't tell if its getting better or if I'm just adapting to what there is.
OK, the jury is back, and the verdict is ... the latter thing.
Vince Vaughn is just hopeless in this. I keep expecting him to deliver fast-talk wisecracks and see a guest appearance from Owen Wilson. Rachel McAdams is nothing more than a Barbie Doll in any roll she gets, with those big sad puppy eyes that portray a life of zero pain beyond getting jilted by her prom date and never getting over it; just a ruinous selection for this roll. And the story keeps rambling with little gel.
Its a nice cop story among a thousand of such out there, but nothing special. In fairness I say that if the first series didn't exist, then this series would still be weak.
But the jury's decision can still be appealed. I have a new appreciation for Colin Farrell.
Follow Ups:
Farrell can be wonderful, he's just been sucked into the Hollywood spin cycle of too many films
too quickly with no one in his management team choosing quality over quantity.
We'll be waiting for True Detective Dos on disc.
True Detective was so superb I wouldn't think the follow-up could be half as satisfying OR
well done on any level, so it seems lowered expectations are a must.
"Once this was all Black Plasma and Imagination" -Michael McClure
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: