|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
50.46.131.186
In Reply to: RE: There are quite a few posted by Victor Khomenko on November 14, 2016 at 16:42:34
that the role of the Ataman would have evolved over the centuries. Iirc, these were high ranking military leaders; compare to multiple star Generals in US Army. Why would they need to retain a centuries old title? Aren't the Ataman (as well as the Cossacks) obsolete?
-Steve
Follow Ups:
I find all that stuff with uniforms, etc. silly, but I am not one of them, so who am I to tell them?
They are determined to preserve their identity, that goes back hundreds of years and is quite colorful. There are many good things that could be said for them, even considering all the controversy, including the pogroms they were famous for. Many of them were forced to leave their homeland, in particular, during the evacuation from Crimea, under the leadership of Vrangel, and these people are remembered warmly in Europe, where they built many roads and bridges.
Anyway, it IS a fascinating subject... there are many movies on it.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: