|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
12.146.151.254
In Reply to: RE: Which B-D movies take advantage of the higher capacity? posted by LarryI on August 21, 2007 at 06:33:00
Based on all the tests I'm aware of, that's not true. I certainly have had no problem with any BD in my collection and I treat them the same as any DVD, CD or SACD.BDs come with a protective polymer coating whereas HD DVDs do not.
Clearly you are biased against Sony, which is fine since you admit it. What I can't stand is when people who hate Sony bash certain formats without saying why.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
Edits: 08/21/07Follow Ups:
The relative sensitivity to damage is what magazines, like Widescreen Review, reported among the pluses and minuses of each format. Personally, I don't abuse my discs, so it is not a big deal to me either way. I don't care at all which standard survives, but, it seems important for the market for one to succeed. As I stated above, I would be willing to get a universal machine if both formats are going to be around for a while, provided such machine is high quality and supports all functions (current machines don't meet either criteria).
I am not happy with Sony because of its half-assed support of certain new formats/product lines it has produced in recent times. This is particularly frustrating because the company, until recently, set high standards for product support, quality, etc.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: