Video Asylum

RE: "... Neither of these "advantages" has been a factor so far..."

208.176.105.98

Jack G

In Reply to: RE: "... Neither of these "advantages" has been a factor so far..." posted by oscar on December 17, 2007 at 07:14:17

>>>You should be asking why the vast majority of HD DVDs do not include lossless/uncompressed audio tracks...<<<
It was originally more for financial reasons than technical. They have since changed their mind.

>>>In contrast, the Blu-ray exclusive studios are now releasing almost every Blu-ray movie with lossless/uncompressed audio.<<<
Actually, since September, almost all of the HD DVDs are lossess too now. That old BD *whine* doesn't cut it any more.

>>>, you can always blame the "inferior" PQ/SQ (collective assessment of a large survey of movie reviews by multiple reviewers)<<<
They must be different reviewers from the ones I read. I have yet to see any advantage of BD-as a whole, they don't look any better than HD DVD.
Jack

Follow Ups:

You are correct the percentage of HD DVD with lossless is rising (but still not close to 100%). - oscar 18:25:06 12/17/07 (1)
"Transformers", "Face/Off" etc....didn't have it. I thought about buying "Shooters" with the Best Buy BOGO but it didn't have it either. Still too many title without lossless (close to 50 % over the past 3 months but getting better).

"Transformers" is my favorite HD DVD video encode (maybe I just like AVC), "King Kong" and "Troy" are overrated IMHO and represent the better HD DVD encodes in my limited HD DVD library. None are the equal of the better Blu-ray movies. YMMV.

I just picked up "Bourne Ultimatum" on the Best Buy BOGO. Maybe this could be my new HD DVD "reference".
- Re: - Jack G 04:52:56 12/18/07 (0)
  As I've said previously, Transformers isn't even in my top 5 or so HD DVDs, though its as good as most BDs out there. Bourne Ultimatum looks quite good, better than any BD I've seen. And its got True HD. Weeeeee!
  Star Trek TOS has lossless (5.1), but personally, I think its a waste on that. I actually don't like it on this, it doesn't sound like the Star Trek I grew up on. I prefer the 2 channel DD+ on this set-the 5.1 sounds too processed to my ears. But, its there for those who must have it regardless of how it sounds, or for people too young to have seen it originally.
  Jack

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable