|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
212.149.228.203
In Reply to: RE: In many cases you are right, but in many DVD are better than that. posted by Christine Tham on February 23, 2008 at 16:30:31
He seems to agree with me.
Mainly due to the NTSC 3:2 pulldown problem.
Among Pro TV and Film people I have never heard anyone prefer the "Never Twice the Same Colour" format.
So I am puzzled with your experience. Please give a few names of DVDs.
Using two discs reduce the space problem.
The 4% is a problem. But playing back at 24fps solve that.
And Mozart used an A of 422 Hz, not the 440 Hz we often use today. The A have moved a lot in the history of music, and 422Hz is 4% below 440 Hz.
So these is not an absolute A, it is a compromise.
see link for Michaels view on PAL/NTSC
Follow Ups:
Last two weeks have been fairly busy for me.
First of all, Michael is not my *boss*.
Secondly, I don't quite see how the article implies "... seems to agree with me.". The article clearly states that it depends on many factors.
The point is if you actually sat down and compared NTSC (R1) vs PAL (R2,R4) titles side by side, as opposed to arguing about theoretical differences, then you can see that typically R1 DVDs tend to have superior picture quality to R2/R4. I have previously suggested that you actually read my reviews (there are hundreds on them on michaeldvd).
For additional information, please refer to the following link which contains comparisons, together with screenshots. You will find on most of the comparisons, R1 picture quality wins.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: