 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
64.12.116.195
In Reply to: RE: Display Selection Help posted by Vic D on March 15, 2008 at 18:02:14
Be sure to look at the Panasonic Plasmas in the 42-50 inch sizes. They weigh less than some of the plasmas, and I think have a blow you away picture with the 720p version all but indistinguishable from the 1080p version. That great consumer testing magazine agrees with me that they are a superior product and that the 720p and 1080p versions are both outstanding.
Plus there are very good deals out there on them relative to Sony and Pioneer I think.
I'm not sure what you were intending on spending, but I think you can find a 50 inch Panasonic Plasma on sale at around $1500, perhaps less, and I have a local ad this AM for the 42 inch 720p version at $1000. I think you would be hard pressed to beat those prices. I also think you are going to have a tough time beating the Panasonic plasma picture quality at any price.
To me 1080p only makes sense if you see yourself building a Blu Ray library and then really only in the 50+ inch sizes..
Follow Ups:
David, Thanks, thats some good information. I'm planing on a +50 display and another display that fits a 44"x28" space. It would be nice to save some shekels on the smaller unit.
I'm interested in hearing peoples preferences regarding Plasma and LCD in hopes that I might be able to see what people like about either format. Currently, walking into a store the LCD's seem extremely vivid compared to the plasma's. I concerned I'm being fooled by exaggerated setups and questioning my own preferences. For example, OK the LCD's have the potential for all this brightness and contrast in the showroom but will I be comfortable living with that presentation compared to the plasma in the long run.
Anybody switched from one format to the other? Thanks.
Vic
Plasma tends to reflect more light from ambient sources.
The plusses on plasma are
1. darkest blacks, highest contrast
2. Best picture quality in fully darkened theater-type space
3. Widest viewing angle
The plusses on LCD are
1. brighter and better picture quality in rooms where there is ambient light
2 less reflectiions
3. lighter weight for a given size
True flat panel LCD's have been improving rapidly both in terms of contrast and viewing angle. non-projection LCD appears to be increasing in popularity relative to plasma. But plasmas are now nearly equal in terms of brightness and probably equal in expected life, too. The projection LCD and projection DLP units seem to be losing out, in part because of depth but mainly because of bulb life in the 2-3000 hour range
I think the expected life of a flat panel LCD vs plasma right now is a wash, and price is a wash. I've heard expected lives of 50,000-70,000 hours on both. Price is a wash. To me the question mainly boils down as to how much ambient light you have in the room.
The Panasonic plasma units I've seen in the store recently seem very bright, almost indistinguishable from the LCD panels.
Unit I would replace my 2004 Sony 46 inch CRT-based flat panel if it fails: No question in my mind but the 50-inch Panasonic plasma--the sheer quality of the picture blows me away even tho the Sony CRT based unit I have is no slouch in that department either. BUT my room has very moderate ambient light.
D
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
