|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
70.143.2.130
In Reply to: RE: here are the specs posted by Joe Murphy Jr on July 11, 2011 at 22:13:11
yeah, i saw those specs too. i'm still learning here - but would there ever be a chance - at least now, that manufacturers would make a display WITHOUT a comb filter? dvd and blu-ray don't need them. i'm thinking digital broadcast doesn't need them either?
the other nutty thing - is why do so many people say the standard def looks bad on a high def display? you'd think with modern comb filters (which are also usually line doublers, eh?) SD, like laserdisc would look pretty good. i mean a 10 year old faroudja DVP-1000 was known for taking SD to HD pretty effectively.
why can't a modern display do even better?
Robby
Follow Ups:
Standard definition video is 480i: it has to be deinterlaced (ie, turned into progressive video) in order to be displayed on a digital display. Proper deinterlacing costs money, though that cost has come down a long way over the past decade.
Scaling would seem to be an easy task, but often times the inexpensive scalers, which are usually off-the-shelf multi-task chips, just aren't up to the task.
Combine the two and you've got the ingredients for a terrible display of SD material. You also have to consider the fact that the manufacturer is going to put the most money into the parts inside the display that make High Definition look the best (it is, after all, an HD display), not polishing up lower resolution material.
but as you say - it could be of low quality.
Thank you for your inquiry. The (TC-P42GT25) has a ("Motion adaptive 3D Y/C Digital Comb Filter") which minimizes noise and cross-color in the picture. The option is located inside ("Advance Picture") as ("3D Y/C Filter"). Thank you for contacting Panasonic. Case #28784020
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: