In Reply to: "Science has absolutely nothing to do with revisionism" posted by clarkjohnsen on August 20, 2002 at 13:29:22:
No one faults his ideas, just on principle alone (but it is a good starting point). His "methods" are flawed. They are scientifically flawed.Maybe you should see the documentary before commenting on it.
mp
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Scientific theories can be revised, but scientific method remains constant... - Mrs. Piggy 14:58:46 08/20/02 (3)
- "His 'methods' are flawed." - clarkjohnsen 07:30:43 08/21/02 (2)
- All four, yes... - Mrs. Piggy 14:05:37 08/21/02 (1)
- good answer for... - The Killer Piglet 18:14:59 08/21/02 (0)