In Reply to: Learning to walk at 28? posted by Victor Khomenko on October 2, 2003 at 08:52:06:
Killer's Kiss came out in 1955, Tarkovsky's film came out in 1960.Breton wrote the Surrealist Manifesto when he was 24. Joyce finished Dubliners by 25. Et cetera. The 20th century is a bygone era. It ain't that easy to be brilliant today, post-Kubrick, post-Tarkovsky, post-Breton, post-Joyce, and so on. Being a 'young artist' today means being under 40. To get anything made today you have to be rich and/or exceedingly well-connected. And even then it's difficult. You have the occasional 25 year old whiz kid, but the fact of their being 25 is used as a marketting angle, and they get to leap frog to the front, perhaps before they're ready.
It's after the end of the avant gardes, it's after the end of an adventurous Hollywood. Kubrick and Tarkovsky were operating in a different world, a world notably free of the influence of, say, Kubrick and Tarkovsky. It's a damn sight harder to do anything noteworthy today, and it's exceedingly difficult to do so as a 'young' artist.
But, again...could you say what it was about the film that you found sugar coated, or specifically lacking? What did your wife think was expecially weak?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yes, exactly. - rhizomatic 09:02:56 10/02/03 (2)
- Re: Yes, exactly. - Victor Khomenko 11:24:16 10/02/03 (1)
- Teenagers, suicide, artistic integrity - rhizomatic 11:38:32 10/02/03 (0)