In Reply to: NO director matches the number of Kubrick's great films. posted by tinear on February 3, 2004 at 07:02:40:
Hitchcock? Wilder? Kieslowski? Cassavettes? Altman? Bergman? Welles?Quality over quantity, I'd say. All of the above might not have quite as many great films, but their best can better Kubrick's in a good many cases, and numerically they're at least nipping at his heels.
_____________________________"What is this, a freak-out?"
- Violet Beauregard
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Kurosawa? Godard? Truffaut? Fellini? Bunuel? - rhizomatic 08:40:05 02/03/04 (30)
- Of course. Tin is simply trolling. (nt) - Victor Khomenko 12:47:17 02/03/04 (12)
- Trolling? No, I just expect intelligent conversation. As yet, none - tinear 16:35:47 02/03/04 (11)
- Re: Kubrick and Spartacus - rico 07:25:15 02/04/04 (0)
- Re: Olivier in Spartacus - rico 07:20:02 02/04/04 (1)
- Re: Olivier in Spartacus - patrickU 09:56:44 02/04/04 (0)
- Re: Trolling? No, I just expect intelligent conversation. As yet, none - patrickU 00:58:24 02/04/04 (7)
- I think to have a proper appreciation for its greatness, one must - tinear 04:57:35 02/04/04 (6)
- Re: I think to have a proper appreciation for its greatness, one must - Victor Khomenko 06:31:19 02/04/04 (0)
- Re: I think to have a proper appreciation for its greatness, one must - patrickU 05:07:57 02/04/04 (4)
- "Being there" maybe? (nt) - orejones 09:11:24 02/04/04 (1)
- Re: "Being there" maybe? (nt) - patrickU 09:15:34 02/04/04 (0)
- "Role" in Strangelove? Which ONE!? - tinear 08:17:35 02/04/04 (1)
- Re: He is no Sir Alec Guiness... - patrickU 08:55:54 02/04/04 (0)
- You place Kubrick in the second tier of directors? Well, - tinear 09:09:11 02/03/04 (16)
- The quality of a director is considered nut just by his achievements, but also... - Victor Khomenko 15:33:07 02/03/04 (14)
- One work as your dying and your entire life's work is...trashed? - tinear 16:14:18 02/03/04 (13)
- One work? - Victor Khomenko 16:42:27 02/03/04 (12)
- Well YOU said one film (EWS) had done "major damage" to his - tinear 17:23:45 02/03/04 (11)
- Re: Well YOU said one film (EWS) had done "major damage" to his - Victor Khomenko 18:04:12 02/03/04 (10)
- 2001 is one of the few science fiction movies that intentionally doesn't parody. - tinear 18:52:29 02/03/04 (9)
- More... - Victor Khomenko 19:19:03 02/03/04 (0)
- As I said, it had its moments, but not enough to make it into a work... - Victor Khomenko 19:17:42 02/03/04 (7)
- Well, the "tecno stuff" is what sci-fi is all about! - tinear 05:02:42 02/04/04 (6)
- You broke the code - I do not like sci-i films... - Victor Khomenko 06:07:53 02/04/04 (1)
- Who cares? Well, don't you think we are becoming more alienated? Consider how - tinear 07:57:01 02/04/04 (0)
- Re: Cappella Sistina. - patrickU 05:21:51 02/04/04 (3)
- Well, of course you don't want to be a member of - tinear 08:01:14 02/04/04 (2)
- Re: Well, of course you don't want to be a member of - patrickU 08:42:24 02/04/04 (1)
- Very different films: I disliked Virgin Suicides and loved LIT. nt - tinear 09:47:03 02/04/04 (0)
- I didn't say that, - rhizomatic 09:16:52 02/03/04 (0)