In Reply to: 21 Grams. posted by patrickU on March 25, 2004 at 12:28:28:
I did not see a lot of films in 2003 but 21 Grams was in the top three. I can't say which was best because no film got more than ****/***** from me.21 Grams was certainly better than all the films nominated with the possible exception of Lost in Translation(which was also in my top 3).
I did not see Master and Commander though but I dunno it just didn't look that good.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Man the film is as disjointed as this post was??? - RGA 22:39:04 03/26/04 (10)
- Re: Yes. - patrickU 00:36:54 03/27/04 (9)
- Maybe because you can't understand - RGA 17:56:44 03/27/04 (8)
- Re: In French? - patrickU 23:15:47 03/27/04 (7)
- Re: In French? - RGA 23:39:33 03/27/04 (6)
- Re: In French? - patrickU 23:55:12 03/27/04 (5)
- Well - RGA 12:50:34 03/28/04 (4)
- Re: Well - patrickU 23:45:15 03/28/04 (2)
- I have seen it again..., and enjoyed it once more! (nt) - orejones 01:26:18 03/29/04 (1)
- Re: Well, You knows Bernardo that I can take you as a reference ( and vice* versa )... - patrickU 02:36:11 03/29/04 (0)
- A few more blows... and Patrick will sucumb and agree - Victor Khomenko 15:26:42 03/28/04 (0)