In Reply to: Well posted by RGA on March 28, 2004 at 12:50:34:
It was not about the * but the contend of the critic I cited this article..I could have chose one who was REALLY bad...Did I write it was SO bad? I was just expecting more.
Your " Ebert " review is not too far away from my present feeling. If you read trough his lines. Anyway this film is and will remain a failure for me.
And I think more than one will be dissilutioned after a second or more visioning, I bet.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Well - patrickU 23:45:15 03/28/04 (2)
- I have seen it again..., and enjoyed it once more! (nt) - orejones 01:26:18 03/29/04 (1)
- Re: Well, You knows Bernardo that I can take you as a reference ( and vice* versa )... - patrickU 02:36:11 03/29/04 (0)