In Reply to: Re: "Close Encounters of the kaka Kind" posted by patrickU on April 7, 2004 at 05:35:07:
"You see what for you is " fair question " is for me " pure impertinence "." Questionning some one who wrote about a film asking him if he ever saw it, goes above my imagination, but I suppose it will depend in what kind of society you are living in...
But it ain´t mine. "I'm afraid it is yours given the fact that you are a regular on a message board where some people do attack films without seeing them.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "Close Encounters of the kaka Kind" - Analog Scott 11:08:43 04/07/04 (32)
- Re: "Close Encounters of the worst Kind" - patrickU 11:39:08 04/07/04 (31)
- Re: "Close Encounters of the worst Kind" - Analog Scott 16:25:11 04/07/04 (9)
- Re: "Close Encounters of the worst Kind" - Victor Khomenko 16:42:26 04/07/04 (8)
- Re: "Close Encounters of the worst Kind" - Analog Scott 18:28:15 04/07/04 (7)
- Liar, liar, pants on fire! Not even worthy of a discussion. (nt) - Victor Khomenko 20:23:06 04/07/04 (6)
- I know you are but what am I? - Analog Scott 21:27:00 04/07/04 (5)
- Why, you are a filthy liar, of course? - Victor Khomenko 06:05:05 04/08/04 (4)
- "...will try to fade away..." - LOL! If you mean departing a thread that's goin' nowhere, I'd agree! - Audiophilander 22:59:02 04/08/04 (2)
- OK, so you are a filthy liar too. (nt) - Victor Khomenko 05:53:50 04/09/04 (1)
- No, I use honest soap; you should try it sometime, to clense the olive parrot stains from your disputed opinions. (nt) - Audiophilander 09:34:55 04/09/04 (0)
- Re: Why, you are a filthy liar, of course? - Analog Scott 09:34:58 04/08/04 (0)
- You will not get no answer - Victor Khomenko 13:58:40 04/07/04 (14)
- Re: You will not get no answer - patrickU 01:25:27 04/08/04 (0)
- Re: You will not get no answer - Analog Scott 16:28:05 04/07/04 (0)
- "...so badly wiped..." Interesting admission/analogy about the "quality" of your own posts. - Audiophilander 14:52:37 04/07/04 (11)
- Re: Decadent European movies. Did I hear right? - patrickU 01:29:29 04/08/04 (7)
- Not "all" European movies are decadent, just the ones you and Victor babble on ad nauseum about. (nt) - Audiophilander 09:49:41 04/08/04 (5)
- Re: Oh, really ? You have a good point. nt - patrickU 09:51:13 04/08/04 (4)
- Don't scare him now... he is making obvious progress! - Victor Khomenko 10:14:19 04/08/04 (3)
- Oh, there are! It's just that most of them are silent and almost all the rest were made before 1950. (nt) - Audiophilander 23:02:22 04/08/04 (0)
- Re: Ok, I will restrain my cynical side. nt - patrickU 10:27:07 04/08/04 (1)
- I'd have that looked at if I were you; the bandage may not stop the decay from turning gangrenous! (nt) - Audiophilander 23:08:54 04/08/04 (0)
- Re: Decadent European movies. Did I hear right? - Victor Khomenko 06:13:28 04/08/04 (0)
- Re: "...so badly wiped..." Interesting admission/analogy about the "quality" of your own posts. - Victor Khomenko 17:08:34 04/07/04 (2)
- Sorry, but I must have missed the last reel of your saccharine melodrama; please fill in the details? - Audiophilander 20:04:40 04/07/04 (1)
- Re: Sorry, but I must have missed the last reel of your saccharine melodrama; please fill in the details? - Victor Khomenko 20:24:02 04/07/04 (0)
- Do you suffer from ADD? That's been answered already! - Audiophilander 13:35:13 04/07/04 (5)
- Re: I will let Victor do the .... - patrickU 01:37:00 04/08/04 (4)
- Is that centigrade or Farenheit? (nt) - Audiophilander 09:51:18 04/08/04 (3)
- Re: Is there life ouside the USA? - patrickU 10:00:22 04/08/04 (2)
- Sorry, I just thought you were naturally cold natured. (nt) - Audiophilander 23:12:59 04/08/04 (0)
- 40 decadent degrees - Victor Khomenko 11:00:28 04/08/04 (0)