In Reply to: Re: "Close Encounters of the worst Kind" posted by patrickU on April 7, 2004 at 11:39:08:
Victor for one. I see he has already jumped into this. Guess he already anticipated an obvious answer.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "Close Encounters of the worst Kind" - Analog Scott 16:25:11 04/07/04 (9)
- Re: "Close Encounters of the worst Kind" - Victor Khomenko 16:42:26 04/07/04 (8)
- Re: "Close Encounters of the worst Kind" - Analog Scott 18:28:15 04/07/04 (7)
- Liar, liar, pants on fire! Not even worthy of a discussion. (nt) - Victor Khomenko 20:23:06 04/07/04 (6)
- I know you are but what am I? - Analog Scott 21:27:00 04/07/04 (5)
- Why, you are a filthy liar, of course? - Victor Khomenko 06:05:05 04/08/04 (4)
- "...will try to fade away..." - LOL! If you mean departing a thread that's goin' nowhere, I'd agree! - Audiophilander 22:59:02 04/08/04 (2)
- OK, so you are a filthy liar too. (nt) - Victor Khomenko 05:53:50 04/09/04 (1)
- No, I use honest soap; you should try it sometime, to clense the olive parrot stains from your disputed opinions. (nt) - Audiophilander 09:34:55 04/09/04 (0)
- Re: Why, you are a filthy liar, of course? - Analog Scott 09:34:58 04/08/04 (0)