In Reply to: 70 style porn vs current porn posted by Heidi2000 on November 17, 2004 at 11:24:25:
Both the men and the women are overall much better looking today. Porn has become so mainstream that there's no shortage of either sex willing to get into the business.There are a lot fewer attempts to actually film movies with any kind of plot these days. Which is just as well, as the acting today is no better, or even worse than it was 20+ years ago.
Yeah, it was much hairier in the old days, too.
The two biggest differences, though, are
a) The sex acts now commonly being filmed. Back in the day you only heard rumors of these things being filmed in Europe or Asia, but now you have 18 year old American beauties from Kansas doing some pretty nasty stuff.
b) The whole genre of "guy with camera" enticing "girl next door" to do porn. Not sure, but it probably started with Ed Powers. Ugliest damned slob that you never wanted to see on camera. The emergence of the Internet has taken that entire theme and multiplied it 1000 fold. Honestly makes you wonder if there are any women under 25 left in this country that _haven't_ had sex on camera.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 70 style porn vs current porn - James L 19:59:53 11/17/04 (7)
- Re: 70 style porn vs current porn - Heidi2000 07:12:52 11/18/04 (6)
- reality check - tunenut 10:02:04 11/19/04 (0)
- Unless you've been living in a cave... - mkuller 10:51:22 11/18/04 (4)
- Re: Unless you've been living in a cave... - Heidi2000 12:13:31 11/18/04 (3)
- Porn today is way more about . . . - JefferyK 09:22:56 11/21/04 (2)
- By the way. - Heidi2000 09:46:08 11/22/04 (0)
- Re: Porn today is way more about . . . - Heidi2000 09:33:04 11/22/04 (0)