In Reply to: Re: 70 style porn vs current porn posted by James L on November 17, 2004 at 19:59:53:
Good points. The idea of the guy with camera enticing the girl next door to do porn can probably attributable to the idea of producing a video that is natural or innocent (which in most case is what everyone likes, or what it should be). This leads back to my original question.You see, when one had sex with his/her partner, unless the partner is in the porn business, she is probably un-shaved in the bottom, and in most case without silicone implants. The couple probably does it without condoms as well. This is natural. This is exactly what the 70's style porn portraits.
Whilst in almost all modern porn’s you will see a plethora of silicone implant, tattoos, Shaved bottom, condoms, body piecing etc. This is not natural. I don't know about you, but I think the industry tries to promote this in order to make money on cosmetics not because they think the viewing public want to see all those things.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 70 style porn vs current porn - Heidi2000 07:12:52 11/18/04 (6)
- reality check - tunenut 10:02:04 11/19/04 (0)
- Unless you've been living in a cave... - mkuller 10:51:22 11/18/04 (4)
- Re: Unless you've been living in a cave... - Heidi2000 12:13:31 11/18/04 (3)
- Porn today is way more about . . . - JefferyK 09:22:56 11/21/04 (2)
- By the way. - Heidi2000 09:46:08 11/22/04 (0)
- Re: Porn today is way more about . . . - Heidi2000 09:33:04 11/22/04 (0)