I love the romanticism and ideals of the fuedal period epics, but this was not original in any sense. I liked "Troy" better, which was not really my favorite action flick either. Hell, "The Lord of the Rings" was more mystical and magical than Merlin here. Camelot did not exist and they basically plodded about barren English soil killing Germans and Italians in an endless cycle of drudgery...
-Bill
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - King Arthur was king of nothing... - KT88 10:38:53 01/25/05 (7)
- I got no problem with a British-Romano Arthur... - Harmonia 20:01:33 01/25/05 (2)
- You know, the plot was like: Saving Private Arthur - mr grits 06:11:52 01/26/05 (1)
- LOL, classic Bruckheimer... - Harmonia 09:18:57 01/26/05 (0)
- Being an average Joe, it was hard to watch Arthur as a Roman soldier. Thanks for Ray Winstone's relief. * - mr grits 18:57:07 01/25/05 (0)
- Re: King Arthur was king of nothing...agreed . . . - townsend 18:43:35 01/25/05 (1)
- Re: King Arthur was king of nothing...agreed . . . - jamesgarvin 11:54:47 02/02/05 (0)
- Was wondering the same thing... - millen 14:14:58 01/25/05 (0)