In Reply to: King Arthur was king of nothing... posted by KT88 on January 25, 2005 at 10:38:53:
Frankly, I eagerly anticipated King Arthur, and it stunk up the theater. I don't tend to like movies that Jerry Bruckheimer is associated with (Pearl Harbor was a disaster [no pun intended]).Alexander was grating . . .
Troy was the best of the lot . . .
I'm looking forward to Kingdom of Heaven and The New World this year. Both have skilled directors--Scott and Malick respectively. Of the two, I'd place my money on Malick's work.
all the best, townsend
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: King Arthur was king of nothing...agreed . . . - townsend 18:43:35 01/25/05 (1)
- Re: King Arthur was king of nothing...agreed . . . - jamesgarvin 11:54:47 02/02/05 (0)