In Reply to: vicious? You mean it was made to offend you? Swank knew about you posted by Duilawyer on February 22, 2005 at 07:18:48:
No, I was seeing lame directing, albeit with a couple of good performances, all wrapped in a package overloaded with GRATUITOUS violence and cheap effects.I had to force myself to finish it. I am not too glad I did.
Things like violence and all that other nasty crap should be done with good taste and moderation, esle it becomes just a big exercise in indulgence a'la Natural Born Killers, and all other things start to disappear.
Since the film had extremely little in the directing area, this was a deadly combination.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: vicious? You mean it was made to offend you? Swank knew about you - Victor Khomenko 08:08:43 02/22/05 (7)
- Re: vicious? You mean it was made to offend you? Swank knew about you - Analog Scott 08:35:43 02/23/05 (5)
- Re: vicious? You mean it was made to offend you? Swank knew about you - Victor Khomenko 09:37:35 02/23/05 (4)
- Re: vicious? You mean it was made to offend you? Swank knew about you - Analog Scott 14:24:04 02/23/05 (0)
- We Do That Too, Sometimes, VK..... - AudioHead 12:48:15 02/23/05 (0)
- Re: vicious? You mean it was made to offend you? Swank knew about you - jamesgarvin 11:07:26 02/23/05 (1)
- Don't bother arguing . . . - JefferyK 16:01:37 02/23/05 (1)
- Re: vicious? You mean it was made to offend you? Swank knew about you - jamesgarvin 15:45:59 02/22/05 (0)