In Reply to: You don't think that intentions are *implicit* to works of art? posted by rhizomatic on March 17, 2005 at 10:25:44:
I mean both critics' opinions and whatever we can say that Eastwood's 'intentions' may have been.
______________________________
Stranger than that, we're alive!Whatever you think it's more than that, more than that.
-Incredible String Band
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Oh, by 'supplementary baggage' here, - rhizomatic 10:27:05 03/17/05 (0)