In Reply to: Re: Ah, Ozu! Okay!. posted by Gee LP on June 12, 2005 at 19:09:35:
Point of clarification: By 'traditional', I mean to say the standard Hollywood norms of continuity filmmaking. Since many 'foreign' filmmakers got their first exposure to film via Hollywood movies ( this is not a slight against the contributions of Russian film), and have/had their film vocabulary shaped through osmosis that way, it is interesting when we see someone 'break' these 'rules'.Re: Ozu--his not-so-strict adherence to the standard notions of axes allows him some novel camera placements ( and subsequent editing of scenes/compositions together which would not otherwise exist ) which would normally be precluded from existence should notions of axis preservation be in full effect. His use of the camera is also interesting in another way, in that it creates the sense of a continuous space in existance beyond the frame, vis a vis the more hermetic filmic space of the traditional sense--in this he hearkens back to the traditional/original proscenium arch type framing of early film, albeit with greater sophistication.
Lots to enjoy!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Ozu - PCL 10:36:39 06/13/05 (0)