Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - "Dogville" - rico 11:48:11 08/07/05 (20)

• Re: Limited vision... - Jeff Starrs 06:15:33 08/08/05 (0)
• you are being generous. I called it Dogs**t. - Analog Scott 20:47:45 08/07/05 (0)
• Agree. . . and the shaky camera gave me a headache. nt - Alex S 16:54:36 08/07/05 (0)
• Nicole was great but, basically, it vacuumed weenies . . . - mr grits 16:54:15 08/07/05 (0)
• I gave up on it half way through. (nt) - C.B. 13:41:39 08/07/05 (1)
• I turned it off 30 minutes into it. (nt) - Jack G 04:52:06 08/08/05 (0)
• Well, at least you're beginning to understand what this forum's about: - tinear 13:19:16 08/07/05 (13)
• Re: Well, at least you're beginning to understand what this forum's about: - jamesgarvin 15:50:28 08/07/05 (5)
• Just two words, Jimmy. - tinear 17:10:13 08/07/05 (4)
• How's that - jamesgarvin 18:06:11 08/07/05 (3)
• Two more: - tinear 07:19:37 08/08/05 (2)
• Re: Two more: - jamesgarvin 14:13:43 08/08/05 (0)
• Re: Two more: - jamesgarvin 10:17:31 08/08/05 (0)
• I thought it was an amazing film (or filmed play) that delved deeply into - sjb 13:23:29 08/07/05 (6)
• You, sir, obviously are a gentleman and a scholar. If I'm not - tinear 15:08:21 08/07/05 (5)
• I greatly enjoyed both Dogville and Beaking the Waves (nt) - Doug Flynn 00:48:10 08/08/05 (0)
• Yeah... but I think The Ice Storm is a very good film - sjb 16:21:18 08/07/05 (2)
• Ok, forget half of what I said. nt - tinear 17:12:16 08/07/05 (1)
• So what does that make me - sjb 21:10:43 08/07/05 (0)
• You are correct - jamesgarvin 15:52:16 08/07/05 (0)

Follow Ups

• Two more: - tinear 07:19:37 08/08/05 (2)
• Re: Two more: - jamesgarvin 14:13:43 08/08/05 (0)
• Re: Two more: - jamesgarvin 10:17:31 08/08/05 (0)