In Reply to: Transporter 2... posted by mkuller on September 5, 2005 at 16:25:51:
I don't understand why he refuses to start a relationship with the client's wife (separated) in this one because of his dangerous profession, while he had no problems getting involved romantically with the daughter of his nemesis in the first Transporter. Oh, that's right, I need to suspend my belief. And the boy needs his father.If you think this action is outrageous, see "Ong Bak." No wires, no air springs, no CGI, just incredible athleticism and stunt people with the highest pain tolerances.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Transporter 2... - TAFKA Steve 16:35:24 09/05/05 (7)
- Re: Transporter 2... - PhilNYC 14:22:32 09/07/05 (0)
- If that's the biggest question... - mkuller 09:50:47 09/07/05 (0)
- Ong Bak - Jack G 04:58:06 09/06/05 (0)
- Maybe the "Transporter" doesn't routinely commit adultery . . . - mr grits 18:59:55 09/05/05 (3)
- Maybe he's gay. - TAFKA Steve 05:53:17 09/06/05 (2)
- Er . . . YOU go ask him. * - mr grits 15:22:57 09/06/05 (0)
- Remember his character in Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels? nt - tinear 06:54:43 09/06/05 (0)