In Reply to: '2010' was MUCH better than '2001'. But that wouldn't take much, IMO. posted by jeffreybehr on October 7, 2005 at 00:04:48:
You MUST be kidding.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: '2010' was MUCH better than '2001'. But that wouldn't take much, IMO. - rico 11:14:15 10/07/05 (0)