In Reply to: Just curious... what made you want to see it again? posted by Victor Khomenko on December 5, 2005 at 17:46:43:
but I'd be lying if I said that was the reason. Fact is, I hooked up my audio to the tv, finally, and wanted to experience the battle scenes again. Funny that those were the least "improved" scenes to my experience. I appreciated much more the relationship between the doc and the "master" though it was a bit dumbed down.
Still, it wasn't based on a "classic" book so one wouldn't expect a masterwork, necessarily. It was superb entertainment, far above the Gladiators, StarWars, and other films made primarily for kids. The music also didn't intrude, a charming attribute often missing these days in just about any genre.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Well, I remembered it took the pains to develop the characters - tinear 05:31:22 12/06/05 (9)
- Re: Well, I remembered it took the pains to develop the characters - Victor Khomenko 06:21:50 12/06/05 (8)
- I am not a huge fan of Crowe's, Vic, so I surprised myself - tinear 11:45:06 12/06/05 (7)
- Re: I am not a huge fan of Crowe's, Vic, so I surprised myself - patrickU 12:34:05 12/06/05 (6)
- I believe the proof of Crowe's masterful performance lies in the fact - tinear 14:32:10 12/06/05 (5)
- Re: I believe the proof of Crowe's masterful performance lies in the fact - jamesgarvin 14:18:55 12/07/05 (4)
- You think directors dictate to actors about how to interpret their roles? - tinear 14:28:37 12/07/05 (3)
- You're incorrect about this. nt - sjb 12:54:22 12/08/05 (0)
- Re: You think directors dictate to actors about how to interpret their roles? - jamesgarvin 08:19:44 12/08/05 (1)
- Re: You think directors dictate to actors about how to interpret their roles? - AudioHead 08:44:43 12/12/05 (0)