In Reply to: A Pointless and Colossal Bore! nt. posted by WinthorpeIII on December 14, 2005 at 15:21:06:
You arer certainly entitled to express your informed opinion, but Peter Jackson's KING KONG is brilliant entertainment! My wife and I saw it this afternoon and LOVED it. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.One question: Have you seen this film and found it lacking or are you just blowing smoke because you don't like the idea that it was made in the first place? Your short take suggests the latter.
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You mean your post? Although I wouldn't describe your comment as "colossal" by any stretch of the imagination! - Audiophilander 22:11:53 12/14/05 (8)
- you are wrong and easily amused - WinthorpeIII 08:25:18 12/15/05 (6)
- For what it's worth, The New Yorker's reviewer slams it in this issue. nt - tinear 12:53:06 12/15/05 (1)
- David Denby is also in the minority of 1st string critics over at Rotten Tomatoes, but... - Audiophilander 15:11:48 12/15/05 (0)
- "Thanks for the uncalled for insults." - I was being polite, if you want insults I can oblige though. - Audiophilander 11:44:39 12/15/05 (3)
- naomi watts was a pleasure to watch. - WinthorpeIII 11:52:26 12/15/05 (2)
- The review is pretty long too... nt - clarkjohnsen 14:50:35 12/15/05 (0)
- The review isn't totally in error, but the reviewer IMIO is wrong. - Audiophilander 14:46:46 12/15/05 (0)
- Thanks for the rec. Dragging Mrs. Warrior - Road Warrior 06:00:36 12/15/05 (0)