In Reply to: For what it's worth, The New Yorker's reviewer slams it in this issue. nt posted by tinear on December 15, 2005 at 12:53:06:
... I wouldn't go so far as to call his marginally negative review a SLAM. Conversely, it comes across as rather tepid, to use a better analogy. His criticism hedges, evoking a feeling of underlying admiration for Jackson's achievement at the same time as he dissects aspects of the film he finds overly long or problematic.AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- David Denby is also in the minority of 1st string critics over at Rotten Tomatoes, but... - Audiophilander 15:11:48 12/15/05 (0)