In Reply to: "The Kong films show a sharp decline, this one a farther step down from the last than the last was down from the first." posted by WinthorpeIII on December 23, 2005 at 13:28:37:
Sorry, Windthorpe, I couldn't disagree with you more. This King Kong is so much better than it's predecessors, with the exception of the original on which it was based, that it makes earlier efforts pale in comparison. It isn't without flaw mind you, but the pompous critic who trashed this film in the San Diego Reader critic's column doesn't know $#!+ from Shinola, IMHO.AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Wrong! - Audiophilander 13:51:10 12/23/05 (3)
- Right, Wrong? C'mon! - WinthorpeIII 14:29:21 12/23/05 (2)
- "The review is just a viewpoint and to me one that is more reasonable than any praise of that mess." It's an isipid ... - Audiophilander 02:27:16 12/24/05 (1)