In Reply to: Unlike some -- I am interested in writing and criticism for its own sake. For instance... posted by clarkjohnsen on December 24, 2005 at 09:26:10:
Have you seen Peter Jackson's King Kong? BTW, a simple YES or NO response will suffice!>>> "Also, kettle to pot! Kettle to pot! Duncan is being called "pompous" by YOU?" <<<
Was that too harsh? Endorsing a critic's opinion without having seen the film in question is indeed pompous and your unwillingness to sever your apparently uninformed opinions from his informed opinions only limits the value of his review. BTW, I do see the movies I review, even if I link other's reviews, after the fact.
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Okay, since you skillfully evaded my question, here's a more direct one (I'm pretty sure that I know the answer): - Audiophilander 00:22:31 12/25/05 (7)
- "BTW, I do see the movies I review." Is that a fact? Then why do you doubt that someone else wouldn't? nt - clarkjohnsen 11:16:37 12/26/05 (6)
- Re: A Question for Mr. Johnsen... - Guy 01:02:47 12/27/05 (5)
- I did not "report on" that woman.. er, that movie. Bug off, don't be a big creep. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:04:53 12/27/05 (4)
- Re:Pot to kettle, kettle to pot: Mr. Johnsen calling on others for name-calling * - Guy 22:14:46 12/27/05 (2)
- Mommy! That mean ol' Mr. Johnsen across the street, he called me a POT!... Mommy, what's a pot? nt - clarkjohnsen 07:30:04 12/28/05 (1)
- Re: How did you know I wasn't *affected* by "kettle"? * - Guy 12:43:32 12/28/05 (0)
- A-ha! So, you didn't see the movie; technically, you're just peddling second hand opinions as your own. - Audiophilander 10:36:10 12/27/05 (0)