In Reply to: Thoughts on sort-of-documentaries such as Munich, Cash, Ray etc.... posted by PdL on January 1, 2006 at 13:17:04:
think you're post begins on a wrong foot.
They are fictionalized accounts of "true" events and personalities but, in a way, so are just about all dramas. So, unless you'd blur the lines between drama and documentaries, you're confused (is Spartacus sort-of-documentary, or El Cid?).
Now, your last sentence is the interesting part: is it legitimate for a director to twist factual events to suit either narrative aesthetics or a personal agenda?
I'd argue the first is ok as long as no significant facts are misrepresented.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- They're not even close to being "sort-of-documentaries," so I - tinear 05:17:06 01/02/06 (3)
- Re: They're not even close to being "sort-of-documentaries," so I - PdL 11:00:10 01/02/06 (2)
- Well, assuming one isn't arguing for the sake of argumentation, - tinear 14:36:25 01/02/06 (1)
- Good points. nt - PdL 00:19:16 01/03/06 (0)