In Reply to: They're not even close to being "sort-of-documentaries," so I posted by tinear on January 2, 2006 at 05:17:06:
"...so I think you're post begins on a wrong foot.">>>>>>> Ok Tin, but your post begins with a grammatical error :-)
"Now, your last sentence is the interesting part: is it legitimate for a director to twist factual events to suit either narrative aesthetics or a personal agenda? I'd argue the first is ok as long as no significant facts are misrepresented."
>>>>>> What if there is a diff of opinon between some of the audience and the director in regards to the depth of significance? Isn't that the issue?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: They're not even close to being "sort-of-documentaries," so I - PdL 11:00:10 01/02/06 (2)
- Well, assuming one isn't arguing for the sake of argumentation, - tinear 14:36:25 01/02/06 (1)
- Good points. nt - PdL 00:19:16 01/03/06 (0)