As some have argued that Ebert is too vague in his film reviews (a review is different from a critique) he has defended his choice of Crash for best film against some of the art house critics who with big words do not know how to watch a film, review a film or even understand what the hell happens in movies. It is quite funny to see Ebert make these art house critics look SOOO dumb.
- http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060108/COMMENTARY/601080310 (Open in New Window)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash - RGA 13:30:33 01/11/06 (13)
- Re: Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash - DualJon 21:12:16 01/14/06 (0)
- Re: Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash - PhilNYC 12:04:57 01/13/06 (2)
- Re: Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash - RGA 15:41:06 01/13/06 (1)
- Re: Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash - PhilNYC 10:27:35 01/16/06 (0)
- Re: Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash - Nicu 21:53:17 01/12/06 (2)
- Re: Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash - jamesgarvin 12:44:49 01/17/06 (0)
- Re: Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash - RGA 15:45:48 01/13/06 (0)
- Sez you. - Harmonia 19:51:03 01/11/06 (0)
- It's a very good movie about a topic which is the - tinear 17:39:56 01/11/06 (0)
- Too bad he picked that movie. - sjb 16:35:52 01/11/06 (1)
- Have you seen the original 'Crash' by David Cronenberg? - Tony D. 13:42:42 01/18/06 (0)
- It was a Terribly Important movie don't you see. - clarkjohnsen 16:19:05 01/11/06 (0)
- It's all a matter of opinion. - grantv 14:10:48 01/11/06 (0)