In Reply to: Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash posted by RGA on January 11, 2006 at 13:30:33:
"it was clear to me how inorganic the movie is and how severely it manipulates and contrives.""A suffocating tangle of ham-fisted ironies and belief-beggaring coincidences"
I totally agree with both comments. Crash is crap.
A few years ago Film Comment trashed both Siskel and Ebert in a very interesting article. I don't think that Ebert is taken seriously by any of the serious film critics.
N
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash - Nicu 21:53:17 01/12/06 (2)
- Re: Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash - jamesgarvin 12:44:49 01/17/06 (0)
- Re: Ebert: A Critical defense of Crash - RGA 15:45:48 01/13/06 (0)