In Reply to: Well, now you have another opportunity.nt posted by jamesgarvin on March 31, 2006 at 08:18:41:
Of course, such matters are purely subjective and there can be no stats showing one critic is as good or better than another. I don't think either of us is likely to change his mind, our tastes are just too different. Which is perfectly fine.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- How so? I don't see any stats or facts, just limp assertions that Ebert's as good. - Donald 20:55:47 03/31/06 (9)
- Weren't you the dork whining about others needing to learn to read? - Analog Scott 08:18:08 04/01/06 (8)
- But their views are in diametric opposition, as anyone who reads them can see. - Donald 21:41:07 04/01/06 (7)
- Indeed, you do need to learn to read. - Analog Scott 09:47:48 04/02/06 (6)
- There's no shovel big enough to haul away the amount of bullshit in James's post. - Donald 05:01:37 04/03/06 (5)
- Re: There's no shovel big enough to haul away the amount of bullshit in James's post. - jamesgarvin 06:39:06 04/03/06 (4)
- Saying they're mass market is meaningless. - Donald 06:48:12 04/03/06 (3)
- Re: Saying they're mass market is meaningless. - jamesgarvin 10:11:20 04/03/06 (2)
- I certainly do disagree with his opinions, not just with the way he writes. - Donald 12:19:12 04/03/06 (1)
- Re: I certainly do disagree with his opinions, not just with the way he writes. - jamesgarvin 15:34:30 04/03/06 (0)