In Reply to: How so? I don't see any stats or facts, just limp assertions that Ebert's as good. posted by Donald on March 31, 2006 at 20:55:47:
Learn to read. The issue wasn't who was better but how similar their views were. That can be shown with stats. Duh.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Weren't you the dork whining about others needing to learn to read? - Analog Scott 08:18:08 04/01/06 (8)
- But their views are in diametric opposition, as anyone who reads them can see. - Donald 21:41:07 04/01/06 (7)
- Indeed, you do need to learn to read. - Analog Scott 09:47:48 04/02/06 (6)
- There's no shovel big enough to haul away the amount of bullshit in James's post. - Donald 05:01:37 04/03/06 (5)
- Re: There's no shovel big enough to haul away the amount of bullshit in James's post. - jamesgarvin 06:39:06 04/03/06 (4)
- Saying they're mass market is meaningless. - Donald 06:48:12 04/03/06 (3)
- Re: Saying they're mass market is meaningless. - jamesgarvin 10:11:20 04/03/06 (2)
- I certainly do disagree with his opinions, not just with the way he writes. - Donald 12:19:12 04/03/06 (1)
- Re: I certainly do disagree with his opinions, not just with the way he writes. - jamesgarvin 15:34:30 04/03/06 (0)