In Reply to: Match Point----- posted by patrickU on May 11, 2006 at 00:43:39:
The movie was a tedious endurance contest for me. The primary character was utterly unlikable and shallow. While the twist was clever it lost all impact when spent on a character I cared so little for. It also lacked texture. It was humorless and poorly paced. That probably added to the sheer tediousness of the movie over all.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I didn't like it - Analog Scott 09:08:13 05/11/06 (15)
- "The movie was a tedious endurance contest for me." -Well, you'd better avoid Hitch's old films then. - Audiophilander 10:07:26 05/11/06 (3)
- Re: "The movie was a tedious endurance contest for me." -Well, you'd better avoid Hitch's old films then. - Analog Scott 12:29:55 05/11/06 (2)
- Re: "The movie was a tedious endurance contest for me." -Well, you'd better avoid Hitch's old films then. - patrickU 04:24:46 05/12/06 (1)
- His opinion appears to be informed; your's, OTOH, as far as Hollywood goes, is shakier than the San Andreas fault line! - Audiophilander 05:36:47 05/12/06 (0)
- Re: I didn't like it - patrickU 09:43:54 05/11/06 (10)
- Re: "...warmed up again..." - rico 09:59:14 05/11/06 (9)
- Re: "...warmed up again..." - patrickU 10:31:27 05/11/06 (8)
- Re: "...warmed up again..." - rico 10:44:36 05/11/06 (7)
- Re: "...warmed up again..." - patrickU 12:00:21 05/11/06 (6)
- But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - Analog Scott 12:32:28 05/11/06 (5)
- Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 00:13:29 05/12/06 (2)
- Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - Analog Scott 08:15:15 05/13/06 (1)
- Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 08:46:29 05/13/06 (0)
- Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - rico 13:05:45 05/11/06 (1)
- Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 00:15:44 05/12/06 (0)