Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Match Point----- - patrickU 00:43:39 05/11/06 (30)

• terrible movie, with acting so over the top it was - Duilawyer 15:48:20 05/14/06 (0)
• Re: Match Point----- - PhilJ 04:52:22 05/14/06 (1)
• Re: Match Point----- - patrickU 04:56:17 05/14/06 (0)
• I was intrigued at the similarity between Brit money and Southern money behaviors . . . just add drawl. * - mr grits 20:28:18 05/11/06 (2)
• Re: Well the Brits were there first...----nt - patrickU 00:10:08 05/12/06 (1)
• And installing the plantations secondly. * - mr grits 06:37:32 05/12/06 (0)
• I didn't like it - Analog Scott 09:08:13 05/11/06 (15)
• "The movie was a tedious endurance contest for me." -Well, you'd better avoid Hitch's old films then. - Audiophilander 10:07:26 05/11/06 (3)
• Re: "The movie was a tedious endurance contest for me." -Well, you'd better avoid Hitch's old films then. - Analog Scott 12:29:55 05/11/06 (2)
• Re: "The movie was a tedious endurance contest for me." -Well, you'd better avoid Hitch's old films then. - patrickU 04:24:46 05/12/06 (1)
• His opinion appears to be informed; your's, OTOH, as far as Hollywood goes, is shakier than the San Andreas fault line! - Audiophilander 05:36:47 05/12/06 (0)
• Re: I didn't like it - patrickU 09:43:54 05/11/06 (10)
• Re: "...warmed up again..." - rico 09:59:14 05/11/06 (9)
• Re: "...warmed up again..." - patrickU 10:31:27 05/11/06 (8)
• Re: "...warmed up again..." - rico 10:44:36 05/11/06 (7)
• Re: "...warmed up again..." - patrickU 12:00:21 05/11/06 (6)
• But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - Analog Scott 12:32:28 05/11/06 (5)
• Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 00:13:29 05/12/06 (2)
• Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - Analog Scott 08:15:15 05/13/06 (1)
• Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 08:46:29 05/13/06 (0)
• Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - rico 13:05:45 05/11/06 (1)
• Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 00:15:44 05/12/06 (0)
• Re: Match Point----- - EdM 06:53:44 05/11/06 (7)
• "I liked it a bit more than others here." - Well, don't include me among the dissenters; Woody served an ace this time. - Audiophilander 09:16:04 05/11/06 (5)
• Re: "I liked it a bit more than others here." - Well, don't include me among the dissenters; Woody served an ace this ti - patrickU 09:38:55 05/11/06 (4)
• "How do you say? Apples and pears." - It's apples & oranges, or in your case, sour grapes & grey poupon. - Audiophilander 10:02:32 05/11/06 (3)
• Re: Oh Boy are you boring! - patrickU 10:25:47 05/11/06 (2)
• PS III - Don't hold your breath dude, there's no sequel here! (nt) - Audiophilander 05:08:27 05/12/06 (1)
• Re: Again! Lack of imagination--- - patrickU 05:18:09 05/12/06 (0)
• Re: Match Point----- - patrickU 07:01:40 05/11/06 (0)

Follow Ups

• Re: I didn't like it - patrickU 09:43:54 05/11/06 (10)
• Re: "...warmed up again..." - rico 09:59:14 05/11/06 (9)
• Re: "...warmed up again..." - patrickU 10:31:27 05/11/06 (8)
• Re: "...warmed up again..." - rico 10:44:36 05/11/06 (7)
• Re: "...warmed up again..." - patrickU 12:00:21 05/11/06 (6)
• But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - Analog Scott 12:32:28 05/11/06 (5)
• Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 00:13:29 05/12/06 (2)
• Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - Analog Scott 08:15:15 05/13/06 (1)
• Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 08:46:29 05/13/06 (0)
• Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - rico 13:05:45 05/11/06 (1)
• Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 00:15:44 05/12/06 (0)