In Reply to: Nothing To Get posted by AudioHead on October 24, 2000 at 07:27:36:
Why are you so categorical in your posts? Did you speak to Kubrick, asked him what he wanted to do in this film, why it didn't work(in your opinion), what you, in his place, would've done differently,etc?
"There's really nothing to get in this film;" You should've left it at that, perhaps. Kubrick isn't a dogma, but one of the best directors that ever stepped into a studio, a thinker.I don't imagine he would make a film that'd be categorized with a dismissing "There's really nothing to get in this film;" This reminds me of people over at the music asylum saying that Mahler's 7th Symphony is garbage or something along these lines. That's rediculous.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Nothing To Get - Dmitry 07:41:07 10/24/00 (6)
- Re: Nothing To Get - Victor Khomenko 08:08:39 10/24/00 (2)
- Re: Nothing To Get - Dmitry 17:06:07 10/24/00 (1)
- Re: Nothing To Get - Victor Khomenko 05:29:18 10/25/00 (0)
- Re: Nothing To Get - AudioHead 07:58:47 10/24/00 (2)
- Re: Nothing To Get - Dmitry 17:30:40 10/24/00 (1)
- Re: Nothing To Get - AudioHead 12:09:45 10/25/00 (0)