In Reply to: Thanks, (more analysis - long. . . .) posted by Tyson on October 24, 2000 at 07:49:33:
**I, however, thought the 2nd half was just as RIVETING as the 1st
half, just slower paced...**The 2nd half was anti-climatic.
**I also thought it was brilliant to contrast, blah, blah, blah, ...
with the BOREDOM and blah, blah, blah....**Yeah, I also sat RIVETED to the screen watching all that BOREDOM, if you
contrast something interesting with something else, make sure that
something else is interesting also, not just variation of structure
and pace.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Thanks, (more analysis - long. . . .) - AudioHead 08:58:36 10/24/00 (2)
- I am curious. . . . - Tyson 10:09:15 10/24/00 (1)
- Re: I am curious. . . . - AudioHead 11:01:59 10/24/00 (0)