was anyone really captivated by this?
Craig is wooden. I am disappointed, especially after reading about his thespian prowess on the English stage. He exhibited the range of... a British Josh Hartnett. Okay, perhaps a tad more.
S P O I L E R:
First off, Chris Connell crooning the title song? Gimme a break. And the song was irritating, at best. Where's ol' Tom when you need him?
The scene in the Casino? A classic!
Of boredom. Only folks that think tv poker is exciting will stay awake as a 24-hour poker game seems to last a week.
The stunts? Well, we've seen them all. The problem, in a nutshell, is that when one expends a massive amount on a stunt, it must be given it's fair share of time, whether or not it sinks the film as efficiently as a building... on the Grand Canal in Venice. That scene shows the problem with the film: five mini-climaxes exhaust the viewer before the arrival of the "real" one. Kind of like having that many appetizers, rich ones at that, before the lukewarm entree hits the table.
Craig has a wonderful figure and all but... why do we see so much more of men's physiques now in film than attractive female's? Are the producers of the new Bond film... gay? Is Craig being pitched to a "diverse" crowd?
In attempting to make this a "serious" Bond film they failed by keeping most of the problems in the earlier efforts but they also eliminated the pieces that kept it a bit interesting: Bond's humor and the gadgets.
The plot was so convoluted, as well, that instead of the listed three writers (usually a sign of problems), it resembled more a cake with ten bakers a warring.
Oh, did I mention the myriad fight scenes?
The Asian martial arts guys have elevated the bar. This film attempts to turn back the clock but all I could think was how much better Connery was in his historic battle in the rail car.
Come to think of it, Craig has more than a passing resemblance to that guy...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - "Casino Royale:" - tinear 16:37:47 11/20/06 (43)
- I think I can summarize my issues with the new Bond: - tinear 06:57:35 11/24/06 (0)
- No more "That's Entertainment" Bond . . we get real Bond . . . - mr grits 16:19:54 11/21/06 (1)
- "Craig is what Fleming had in mind." As stated: A killing machine for HM Government. nt - clarkjohnsen 19:56:15 11/21/06 (0)
- Re: "Casino Royale:" - Bulkington 14:36:12 11/21/06 (10)
- Completely agree with you Bulkington nt - Daryl Zero 20:52:36 11/22/06 (0)
- Second the opinion on Portishead for the title song..absolutely inspired call! n/t - PCL 06:32:23 11/22/06 (0)
- Connery's Bond is far closer to the only authentic one, - tinear 04:51:30 11/22/06 (4)
- Re: Connery's Bond is far closer to the only authentic one, - Bulkington 07:07:23 11/22/06 (3)
- Okay, okay, my standards are just higher than yours. Be happy! nt - tinear 15:14:16 11/22/06 (2)
- Re: Not by valuing the older Bond films they aren't! (nt) - Bulkington 08:53:24 11/23/06 (1)
- Dr. No and Goldfinger were the best of the genre. By far. nt - tinear 17:38:18 11/23/06 (0)
- Yes, "Tinear..." - EBerlin 21:35:30 11/21/06 (1)
- A fine example of the East Berliner wit and humor. - tinear 08:07:35 11/23/06 (0)
- "Good Lord." An effective albeit brief reply to all unjust criticism. Plus, the guy is weird about gay. nt - clarkjohnsen 19:54:21 11/21/06 (0)
- Re: "Casino Royale:" - rico 13:34:44 11/21/06 (1)
- Re: "Casino Royale:" - jamesgarvin 14:54:05 11/21/06 (0)
- Re: "Casino Royale:" - jamesgarvin 07:03:30 11/21/06 (1)
- " I suspect you were probably beat up a lot on the playground." Ooh! That would explain the internet bully. But what... - clarkjohnsen 12:04:49 11/21/06 (0)
- Re: "Casino Royale:" - townsend 20:48:47 11/20/06 (24)
- Killer problems with "Casino:" Craig. He acts like he - tinear 05:05:55 11/21/06 (19)
- I'll agree the first chase scene and the tanker truck scene were a bit much... - oscar 14:07:30 11/23/06 (0)
- No offense, but you were apparently watching a different movie than I. - Audiophilander 09:03:37 11/21/06 (17)
- Not "apparently" but definitely. I read all the Bond novels when they came out in the sixties. - tinear 13:58:45 11/21/06 (16)
- LOL! Well, I guess that you were shaken, but not stirred by the new Bond film. - Audiophilander 17:16:59 11/21/06 (11)
- A good example of this film's poor writing: in two key sequences, - tinear 05:01:46 11/22/06 (10)
- Like I said, we saw different movies. - Audiophilander 07:38:46 11/22/06 (9)
- Proctologist? Going into the gutter here, Auph: won't follow you there. - tinear 15:20:42 11/22/06 (8)
- Re: But - rico 07:58:32 11/23/06 (2)
- Don't forget, he read the book when it came out in the 60's.nt - jamesgarvin 08:54:53 11/24/06 (0)
- Yes, the focal point. But not 1/2 the number of pages! You think - tinear 08:09:57 11/23/06 (0)
- Hey, I'm just speculating based on the crankiness of your mood. - Audiophilander 23:13:57 11/22/06 (4)
- Quite honestly, you're hallucinating. I am attacking the Bond film, - tinear 05:08:18 11/23/06 (3)
- The "foul" comment was just a gentle gibe; for someone vigorously attacking folk's opinions you seem oddly sensitive... - Audiophilander 11:11:55 11/24/06 (2)
- I pointed out the RIDICULOUS plot elements and the more I did, the more - tinear 16:20:03 11/24/06 (1)
- "I don't mind, it's the loser's way of waving the internet white flag." - LOL! Really? - Audiophilander 23:29:48 11/25/06 (0)
- Re: Umm. Casino Royale was published in 1953. His first seven bond novels were written in the 50's.nt - jamesgarvin 14:34:07 11/21/06 (3)
- Okay, I READ them in the 60s, after JFK said he liked them. Thanks for - tinear 04:54:01 11/22/06 (1)
- Well, we would not need fact checkers if.... - jamesgarvin 07:41:29 11/22/06 (1)
- Quite right. However: William F. Buckley Jr.'s spy novels are several cuts above Fleming's. Plus... - clarkjohnsen 20:01:43 11/21/06 (0)
- I tend to agree; we'll be buying the DVD, too. - Audiophilander 21:59:28 11/20/06 (3)
- Re: I tend to agree; we'll be buying the DVD, too. - TomD 13:02:00 11/24/06 (0)
- Re: I tend to agree; we'll be buying the DVD, too. - TomD 08:45:54 11/22/06 (0)
- Re: I tend to agree; we'll be buying the DVD, too. - jamesgarvin 07:09:11 11/21/06 (0)