In Reply to: Quite honestly, you're hallucinating. I am attacking the Bond film, posted by tinear on November 23, 2006 at 05:08:18:
... when that criticism is directed back at you. Try to keep in mind that the "proctological" comment was merely a jest directed at your apparent tunnel vision in regard to this film. If per chance my remark struck a nerve unknowingly, I'm sorry.>>> "of course, but I don't think I addressed any "foul" comments your way?" <<<
You threw some pretty "loud" inferences out that anyone who likes this film is crazy even when they politely explain to you precisely why they like it.
>>> "Please, don't feel bound to discuss things if you take them so personally as to see insults at you where they don't exist." <<<
I calls 'em as I sees 'em.
>>> "Bond sucks." <<<
Your opinion, not mine.
>>> "Does that imply you do?" <<<
Only when you start sentences with "You" followed by a rhetorical question instead of "If" followed an impression.
>>> "How? " <<<
Asked and answered.
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The "foul" comment was just a gentle gibe; for someone vigorously attacking folk's opinions you seem oddly sensitive... - Audiophilander 11:11:55 11/24/06 (2)
- I pointed out the RIDICULOUS plot elements and the more I did, the more - tinear 16:20:03 11/24/06 (1)
- "I don't mind, it's the loser's way of waving the internet white flag." - LOL! Really? - Audiophilander 23:29:48 11/25/06 (0)