In Reply to: Thanks, Clark; that's a super review! posted by Audiophilander on December 11, 2006 at 12:22:54:
Over the last few years I have written up over half the movies I've seen, occasionally being paid. Frequently my views appear here.The thing is, I don't go to crap like Planet of the Apes. And the "art films" that Victor and I (inter alia) enjoy, you excoriate.
As for posting pointers to reviews, I admire certain writers and simply wish to share their work on AA; I've been much more often thanked, than lambasted by such as you and the unspeakable Analog Scott.
Suggestion: Why don't you just not go there, and save us the bandwidth and time? Besides, who needs the negativity?
"I may just have to take a chance on this one." Yeah, for all the good a great review does!
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Thank you. But your condescension is once again duly noted. - clarkjohnsen 07:47:12 12/13/06 (7)
- No condescension intended. - Audiophilander 12:08:21 12/13/06 (6)
- "All I ask of folks who choose to criticize a film is that they've at least seen the film." That is of course a truism. - clarkjohnsen 08:18:11 12/14/06 (5)
- "Who are you to do this asking?" - Just a film aficianado desiring accurate, first-hand information ... - Audiophilander 02:22:58 12/15/06 (4)
- "No condescension intended, but is that clear enough for you, Clark?" Condescension alert! - clarkjohnsen 08:50:56 12/15/06 (3)
- How can one supply "pointers" for films admittedly unseen? - Audiophilander 10:12:08 12/15/06 (2)
- "You're apparently a humbug." Thanks, teach, that's good to know. - clarkjohnsen 12:17:56 12/15/06 (1)
- Well, if you're not full of yourself, then lets take a look at your half-empty glass: - Audiophilander 09:51:54 12/17/06 (0)