In Reply to: No condescension intended. posted by Audiophilander on December 13, 2006 at 12:08:21:
But down to the nitty gritty:-- Who are you to do this asking?
-- Inasmuch as I post pointers to reviews that are laudatory as well as critical, are you suggesting that only the latter be removed from this forum?
-- Have you ever considered simply not reading the offending texts?
Also note, I was a huge and early fan of such as Pirates of the Caribbean, and a detractor of LOTR II, which I did bother to see in the director's cut on the big screen. I am far from averse to what I call "matinee movies".
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "All I ask of folks who choose to criticize a film is that they've at least seen the film." That is of course a truism. - clarkjohnsen 08:18:11 12/14/06 (5)
- "Who are you to do this asking?" - Just a film aficianado desiring accurate, first-hand information ... - Audiophilander 02:22:58 12/15/06 (4)
- "No condescension intended, but is that clear enough for you, Clark?" Condescension alert! - clarkjohnsen 08:50:56 12/15/06 (3)
- How can one supply "pointers" for films admittedly unseen? - Audiophilander 10:12:08 12/15/06 (2)
- "You're apparently a humbug." Thanks, teach, that's good to know. - clarkjohnsen 12:17:56 12/15/06 (1)
- Well, if you're not full of yourself, then lets take a look at your half-empty glass: - Audiophilander 09:51:54 12/17/06 (0)