In Reply to: In defense of Bergman. posted by patrickU on August 13, 2007 at 06:26:41:
It was an interesting read. Seems like a lot of overthinking going on IMO, for works by film makers that are very personal and bound to be experienced differently by different people.
I don't think Bergman needs defending. I do respect that Ebert wanted to defend him against what he felt was flawed reasoning.
Rod
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: In defense of Bergman. - Rod H. 19:41:20 08/13/07 (13)
- RE: In defense of Bergman. - jamesgarvin 08:02:17 08/14/07 (11)
- Neophytes seeking Bergman - Jon L 11:37:39 08/14/07 (10)
- RE: " Hated Seventh Seals---" - patrickU 13:37:59 08/14/07 (8)
- Have you seen it lately? - Jon L 11:59:16 08/15/07 (2)
- RE: Have you seen it lately? - patrickU 12:56:09 08/15/07 (0)
- I saw it a few months ago... and loved it!! - sjb 12:06:13 08/15/07 (0)
- "That can not be." - Hey, I can understand disliking the film. - Audiophilander 23:12:51 08/14/07 (4)
- RE: Wilder? - patrickU 00:35:53 08/15/07 (3)
- RE: Wilder? Yep. - Audiophilander 09:00:10 08/15/07 (2)
- RE: Wilder? Yep. - patrickU 09:41:03 08/15/07 (1)
- "Stalag should be to your taste too, I wonder why you did not put it in." - Because, ... - Audiophilander 13:33:52 08/15/07 (0)
- RE: Neophytes seeking Bergman - jamesgarvin 11:39:39 08/14/07 (0)
- RE: In defense of Bergman. - patrickU 03:29:03 08/14/07 (0)