In Reply to: In defense of Bergman. posted by patrickU on August 13, 2007 at 06:26:41:
From: Bertrand Tavernier, Paris, France (To Ebert)
Read and loved your defense of Bergman. Everything you say, all the points you raise, are valid, make sense and refute the vicious attacks of this sometimes brilliant but very often intolerant and rigid writer. He [Jonathan Rosenbaum] has a lot of pre-conceived opinions and for him a lot of films and directors are presumed guilty before being heard or seen. You have a right to dislike Bergman or Herman Melville or Malraux. You have the right to prefer Raymond Chandler or Balzac or Eudora Welty to Heidegger or Ezra Pound. But nobody forces you to write that, to take a public position against the artist you do not like. Most of the time the essays and books written against are forgettable or narrow-minded. You can like Dreyer and Bresson without firing at Bergman or Fellini. It was the great mistake of some of the best French critics such as Francois Truffaut; to defend Hitchcock, which was an important cause, he felt the obligation to wipe out the entire British cinema. To push Rosselini, Ophuls or Jacques Becker (have seen recently his “Touchez Pas au Grisbi†and the very modern description of the aging gangster, very innovative), you had to eliminate De Sica, Duvivier or Autant-Lara. To praise Mann you had to kill Delmer Daves. It seems that Mr Rosenbaum, who has been impressed by the new wave, has learnt more the intolerance than the perception
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Apparently, a French director felt compelled to enter the fray as well... - jamesgarvin 11:41:22 08/14/07 (2)
- RE: I don´t agree. - patrickU 13:24:02 08/14/07 (0)
- I couldn't agree more....... - danj 12:55:06 08/14/07 (0)