In Reply to: RE: WTF!... posted by jamesgarvin on August 22, 2007 at 10:23:04:
Question 1.
What is your analysis of the original question? Please be thorough; I expect several paragraphs. Please refrain from any reference to my earlier comments. You should strive to be original in thought and expression. Demonstrate the depth of your knowledge concerning the talent, careers and reputation of the lead players mentioned, including the director, and how that comes to bear on the relative (lack of) success of the movie at the boxoffice.
Further, will "Breach", an ADMITTED CRITICAL SUCCESS, have staying power in the pantheon of like films. Why? Use "The Spy Who Came In From The Cold" as a benchmark comparison in your discussion.
Question 2.
Why didn't you respond to the original question in the beginning, instead of picking my comments - out of context - to snipe at? What does this say about your general approach to participation in this forum. Are you interested in construction or destruction? Objective or personal?
Question 3.
Why can't you discern the multitude of questions - direct and implied - I've repeatedly directed toward you in this silly spat.
Question 4.
Which are you, stupid, afraid or inattentive? I know, that's a wiseass remark. I really don't care.
Question 5.
Do you want to kiss and make up? I'm tired of dealing with this silliness. If "no" then go to next question.
Question 6.
In future, will you please just ignore me and my comments? I'm hoping for a simple "yes" to this question.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- James... - afilado 11:26:10 08/22/07 (2)
- RE: James... - jamesgarvin 13:45:44 08/22/07 (1)
- Once more... - afilado 17:02:04 08/22/07 (0)