In Reply to: American Gangster: a thin film posted by dave c on January 9, 2008 at 21:46:14:
If it really happened, the judge who allowed it was insane. It clearly violates rules of ethics, and trial conduct, where the jury would be confused if the detective was telling things he really knew or just advocating for the DA's office. Absurd. And very odd that the detective would agree to do that, and then represent the gangster??????????????????
Payoff.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- that prosecuting the crook he captured is absurd. - Duilawyer 09:39:48 01/10/08 (3)
- I could understand... - dave c 12:01:18 01/10/08 (2)
- At every trial, the judge begins by telling the jury that what the LAWYERS - Duilawyer 17:44:20 01/10/08 (1)
- I would love to see the defence on cross... nt - dave c 18:36:51 01/10/08 (0)