In Reply to: RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt posted by patrickU on July 3, 2008 at 07:38:09:
>> The spirit of it.>>
That's not a specific digital effect.
>> The whole scenery empeach me to dream, I could with " The Wizard of Oz "..
In small dose I have no problem but with half of the film...And then you see like in this particular film the actress, in this case that young girl, looking somewhere pretending to see the Pan or something else.
You know what?
It cries out loud : FAKE!>>
Um.... Pan was there. It was a guy in a suit. You didn't like it because you imagined it was a digital effect?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - Analog Scott 13:11:37 07/03/08 (9)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - patrickU 13:16:16 07/03/08 (8)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - Analog Scott 13:40:12 07/03/08 (7)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - patrickU 04:51:17 07/04/08 (6)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - Analog Scott 08:59:44 07/04/08 (5)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - patrickU 01:38:14 07/05/08 (4)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - Analog Scott 12:00:19 07/05/08 (3)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - patrickU 12:09:14 07/05/08 (2)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - Analog Scott 12:28:47 07/05/08 (1)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - patrickU 13:16:42 07/05/08 (0)